Fengrun Court: one hour, across three provinces!Seal control can not block the “cloud” end solution road

2022-07-11 0 By

Current epidemic, to continue to do a good job of epidemic prevention and control and judicial work, be epidemic prevention working principle of “” “balance “, protect parties’ legitimate rights and interests, based on the Internet platform, rich court organization, the original, the accused both sides online mediation successfully together already proposed business contract disputes to the jurisdiction of the court, won the praise on both parties.In the middle of February 2022, Fengrun Court accepted the case of a company in East Jidong vs. a company in Inner Mongolia, the defendant company raised an objection to jurisdiction during the submission of defense, arguing that Fengrun Court had no jurisdiction and requested to transfer the case to another court for trial.Gao Lijun, the presiding judge, informed the plaintiff’s agent at the first time, and informed both parties by telephone: no matter which court the case is under the jurisdiction of, both parties should proceed from the facts and properly resolve the conflict.Finally, with the communication of the judge and the joint efforts of the agents of both sides, the two sides basically reached a settlement plan, and the defendant company paid the plaintiff a lump sum penalty of 300,000 yuan within two days after the mediation took effect.According to the law, during the period when the parties raise objection to the jurisdiction of the case, the people’s court cannot carry out substantive hearing of the case, so the mediation of this case should be based on the defendant withdrawing the application for objection to the jurisdiction.When the defendant was sending the written application by express mail to the presiding judge, COVID-19 broke out in Tangshan, which led to the implementation of lockdown management in the whole region, and all the sending and delivering business stopped. As a result, the presiding judge could not receive the application, and the mediation of the case fell into deadlock.Under such circumstances, Judge Gao Lijun adjusted the thinking of handling cases in a timely manner, made full use of the intelligent court system, obtained the consent of both parties, and changed the litigation activities from offline to online.WeChat defendant agent by submitting the defendant company chop has withdrawn his application for the jurisdiction of the court, the judges and the participants in the proceedings the court via the Internet online mediation plan, make the judges of the section of tangshan, Beijing, shenzhen, using the agent within an hour of complete mediation plan finalized, remote record signing, the service of civil the conciliation statement.Now the defendant has fulfilled all the obligations according to the conciliation statement, and the plaintiff also said that he has received all the money, so the dispute between the two sides has been completely resolved.In the Internet era of rapid development, rich court since the bear all the time, make full use of wisdom court construction achievements, on the premise of case, the “justice and efficiency” throughout the course of the work in time to respond to the demands of the parties, minimizing the impact on the judicial work, disease to safeguard the lawful rights and interests of the parties, is the escort of regional economic development.Statement: This article is reproduced for the purpose of passing on more information.If the source is wrong or violated your legitimate rights and interests, please contact the author with proof of ownership, we will promptly correct, delete, thank you.Email address: newmedia@xxcb.cn